Posted on Leave a comment

Wikipedia – encyclopaedic or idiotic?

WikipediaReading Time: 6 minutes

Everyone’s familiar with Wikipedia – “the encyclopedia that anyone can edit”. It sounds like a great idea, doesn’t it? A vast, sprawling reference work that everyone in the world can add their knowledge to, with administrators and fact-checking mechanisms to make sure nobody’s contaminating it with nonsense. In theory at least, it should end up containing all the open-source information in the world and be constantly checked for accuracy by thousands of dedicated users.

Continue reading Wikipedia – encyclopaedic or idiotic?

Posted on Leave a comment

Surprise result for PMI in New Zealand iQOS case

iQOS caseReading Time: 4 minutes

If you follow the news on heated tobacco products you’ll probably have noticed that Heat not Burn hasn’t been having an easy ride in every market. Despite the spectacular success of iQOS in Japan, where it’s now taken over more than 15% of the cigarette market in just two years, some governments have decided they’d rather keep collecting cigarette taxes than give smokers the option of switching to a lower-risk product.

Continue reading Surprise result for PMI in New Zealand iQOS case

Posted on 2 Comments

California study claims iQOS risks – but is this good science?

iQOS scienceReading Time: 5 minutes

Im my last post I mentioned that there would be some good news about Glo being released today. What I didn’t know at the time was that some bad news about iQOS was also scheduled for release. Luckily the ever-resourceful Dick Puddlecote tipped me off that it was coming. He wasn’t the only one who knew about the paper, either; Philip Morris International have obviously got hold of an advance copy in plenty of time to have a look at it and compare its conclusions to their own science.

Continue reading California study claims iQOS risks – but is this good science?